Real County 2nd Amendment Resolution
The Real County Commissioner’s Court passed a resolution in support of the 2nd Amendment on February 10, 2020. The resolution and its amendment to the title and its contents are presented below:
The Real County Commissioner’s Court passed a resolution in support of the 2nd Amendment on February 10, 2020. The resolution and its amendment to the title and its contents are presented below:
The Real County Republican Party held their 2020 primary candidate forum on February 8, 2020. We featured 7 speakers who qualified for the ballot. The speakers in order were:
Jack DuBose, Real County Republican Chairman
Christina Mitchell Busbee, District Attorney, 39th Judicial Dist
Brad Hart, County Commissioner, Precinct 1
Kevin Chisum, County Constable
Nathan T. Johnson, Sheriff
Terrie Pendley, County Tax Assessor-Collector
Linda Massman, County Tax Assessor-Collector
The new precinct chairs for this election cycle were announced. Precinct Chairs are automatically consummated upon filing if unopposed and take office upon the post state convention organization meeting. These precinct chairs are as follows:
Frank Freeman, Precinct 1 Chair
Dr. Christina Johnson, Precinct 2 Chair
Brenda Askew, Precinct 4 Chair
Precinct Chairs for 3, 6 & 7 are vacant.
Announcement was made for the Real County Convention to be held on March 21, 2020.
I’ve been consulting with a friend on a story of her work on a project that has received very little attention from the mainstream media. This is her unedited story, along with my observations and analysis.
In Her Own Words
“The year was 2014; that’s when my journey into a new frontier gave birth. This new adventure into what I call my new frontier, is one I never in my lifetime thought I’d experience. It all started with a call from a contracting company one Saturday afternoon in 2014. This contracting company was looking for people to take on a project that would assist the United States Emergency Management Team, along with another state agency. After you read about my experience while working on this project, you will probably ask why I didn’t stop working for these organizations? Why as a conservative, that I am, I continued? Well, I continued, because I felt it was necessary to fully understand the entire scope of the project, from the starting to the ending of the project.”
In My Own Words
In 2014 and 2015 we knew here in Texas something nefarious was coming down, on the border and in our own back yards. We just didn’t know all the details. Years later we found out some of the details. Those details would be bombshell reports had they come out at the time and fully explains why in the political world suppression of this type of information serves the unitary ruling apparatchik, at that time being the Obama Administration. These reports come from a friend who served the rulers of those times. We knew who the rulers were, but we didn’t know the full context of WHAT they were. Perhaps these reports in some small way will shine more light on them, that light being the ultimate disinfectant.
The First Report
“My first project started in Kerrville, TX. I was told to report to the location where my interview took place, and to report exactly at 3:00 am. All paperwork was in proper order, NDA Forms filled out, and we were ready to load the buses. We loaded up charter buses (4), and our destination was unknown. I was told not to share the location with my spouse or anybody else. We finally arrived at our location, attended a briefing, and then we were told the full details about our project and where we were located. We would stay at our location in Kerrville, no more than twenty-four days, and we were there to care for 1500 illegals that had crossed our borders. My assignment was to provide direct care for these children. They ranged from 10 to 17 years of age and our site was to be called Alpha. We provided food, clothes, shoes, under clothes, bedding, sports equipment, yarn, construction paper, play cards, and puzzles. I was also assigned to teach them English, and Bible. On Sundays, the staff would hold church services, praise and worship time (in Spanish). After our twenty-four days had expired, it was time to move. We headed to another location, called Wimberley. This camp was to be called Bravo. We the staffers had security for our protection in every camp. We had Texas Rangers that were assigned to our camps for our protection.”
In the Middle of the Night
I inquired about the NDA but my friend indicated it was not available and strangely enough she was not given a copy of the form. Perhaps even the existence of a written agreement would be evidence to hide? In any case, she believes she is no longer subject to the NDA. I wonder where it would stand had Hillary won the election. Also, please note the report time she gives as 3:00 AM. That is the first day on the job. It is in the middle of the night, a time chosen obviously so as not to alert anyone. And how in the world are the workers supposed to keep secret even from their own spouse when they go out in the middle of the night? Nefarious indeed!
Camps and Caravans
“As we headed to our new location, we traveled in a caravan, composed of 5-6 charter buses if not more, and 5 or more vans. Bravo was our new camp in Wimblerley, TX, and the same routine would continue, with the same assignment, for twenty-four days. We traveled through back roads to our new destinations, so as not to be so obvious to the public, as the Governor of Texas, and the people of Texas knew nothing of the camps within their communities. After Bravo ended, there were other camps in different locations: Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxfire, and finally Golf. The locations or communities utilized were Kerrville, Wimberley, Leakey, Vanderpool, San Antonio (Lackland Air Base), Ft. Sill in Oklahoma, and finally El Paso. The same expense was incurred in every location, because we received new illegals. Sometimes the borders were impacted by 1,000 children per day. The surge of children was huge. Some children started their journey in Arizona, and evidently ended up in Texas. Busloads would arrive and it was time to work. We were told the illegals were government property, we were not to mistreat them, or take photos of them, or with them. If we mistreated any illegal or took photos, we were warned we would be arrested. One staff member didn’t heed to the warning. She took photos of them. At 3:00 am, the Sheriff, the Texas Ranger, and upper management were banging on my cabin door, looking for that staff member. She was arrested and escorted off the property. So illegals were to be treated with respect, dignity, and whatever they needed, and we were to assist them.”
My Hometown
Everything seems to happen here at 3:00 AM almost like a script. I wonder what charge was used to arrest the contractor she mentions. A violation of the NDA would be a civil violation would it not? She mentions Leakey here, my hometown. I recall the year 2015 when a massive crowd assembled at the Courthouse in Leakey, Texas to hear from military personnel on an operation named Jade Helm. The people were suspicious when the word got out the military were conducting what they called “training exercises”. The media were here. We gave them interviews. We made the news not because of the event but because the media thought we were right wing conspiratorialists. I recall the people apologizing to the officer in charge believing they were being used by the Obama Administration of which purpose no one could explain. We in rural Texas are very supportive of the military you see and were conflicted on any possible nefarious use of our troops. It was just a bad feeling. The people did not buy the presenters’ explanations. The Commissioner’s Court did. Was the military maneuvers just a distraction of the REAL operation? I wonder now. Perhaps there really were military training exercises but the real purpose was to cover up or distract from the camps set up outside of town. The people NEVER were told about any such camp here in Leakey, Texas other than those of Jade Helm and that location was not revealed.
The Children Arrive
“When children first started arriving, they were already taken care of. By this I mean they were bathed, they were clean, they didn’t have lice anymore if any. They were arranged in different areas: girls in a certain area, and boys in another location. The Case Managers would connect with relatives in the state, and the children after a certain time would be flown to different locations (New York, Virginia, Miami, California, Boston, and some would stay in Texas). These children would meet up with their relatives in each location. These children had a certain timeframe to meet with a judge and he would determine their final stay in the United States. It was difficult for me to understand how their relatives could reside in the cities mentioned above, as these locations are so expensive to live, and also how they could afford the legal aspect of their situation, but those were the designated cities they were flown to. And yes, another expense incurred by you the taxpayer again.”
Our Fading Memories
Memories tend to fade, but mine is still pretty vivid of those years since I was politically involved. Immigration, but especially illegal immigration was on everyone’s mind. Things haven’t changed much, but the emphasis certainly has with the crackdown now undergoing in the Trump Administration.
The Surge
“As time continued, the surge of children became over bearing for our borders. They would then arrive at my location and doctors, nurses, clinicians, and direct care would prepare for their arrival. As we were told “fresh meat was arriving”. This meant that these children were arriving with illnesses, lice, and dirty, not vetted. Physicians were the first process in their arrival, as they would have to wash their hair and use lice products to clean out their hair. My job was next. After hair washing, I would take them to their quarters, line them up, take all their belongings (money, phone numbers, rings, earrings, clothes, shoes, under clothes) and place the items in an airtight bag to be archived. They would take showers, change into clean clothes, and were assigned a bed. After completing my task, I would provide all the phone numbers to the Case Managers and they would start the vetting process. The same expense would be incurred in every camp. Sometimes in the afternoon, I would assist by calling the children’s relatives in Guatamala, Honduras, Mexico, and a few from India. That would be another expense incurred by you, the taxpayer.”
Creating Jobs?
The media tells us illegal immigrants contribute to our economy. They create jobs. They pay taxes. They prop up Social Security. We begin to see exactly what they mean. They start out using valuable resources and those resources DO create some jobs, not just the jobs of those taking care of them but also jobs to hear their cases, i.e. attorneys, some private and some subsidized by the Federal government and immigration judges and more border patrol agents, ICE, prison guards for those who commit crimes, social workers and the bureaucracy that entails, here in Texas DPS Officers and Texas Rangers and the list goes on and on. If that is their point, then yes, illegal immigration creates jobs. Are those the kind of jobs we seek to create?
The Governor
“Finally after five months, Governor Perry found out about the camps and was of course furious. Come July 2014, Governor Perry sent 1,000 National Guard to our borders. He was extremely upset that only Obama knew about the activity, and at some point the Pentagon. The camp in Ft. Sill, Oklahoma, was also of course approved by Obama. It housed 1200 illegal immigrants at the base, and when the people of Oklahoma became aware of the housing situation, they were not happy campers. Once again the routine of purchasing clothes, food, shoes, and hiring staff (1200), had begun (taxpayer expense once again). When the residents found out why we were there, we were pretty much treated rudely. We were told to go out in groups, not alone. Hotels were demanding our staff leave their rooms, as many hotels were full of staff. I remember when I was headed back home, a coworker and I went to rent a car to drive back home. They didn’t want to rent us a car, because we worked at Ft. Sill. Cab drivers would not pick up our staff, so it became a serious situation.”
The Governor’s Missing in Action
I don’t quite understand how the use of the Texas Rangers prior to the Governor involvement occurred. Can the Pentagon and others actually commandeer the Texas Rangers without state involvement or at least notification? I don’t doubt the story here, but I wonder if our Governor in 2014 was up front with the people. It may have been that Governor Perry knew there was a request for extra law enforcement without knowing the details. And who was the state agency she mentioned earlier. She did not seem to know. The workers appeared to be given only “need to know information”. In any case, something is remiss here.
Her Deployments
“During my stay, I had to deploy twice (they called it deployments), as I caught strep throat from the illegal immigrants. When we felt sick, we would report to the medical staff, only to be told the medications were ONLY for the illegal immigrants, not for us. So whoever became ill, had to go out and spend their own money to receive medical assistance in the outside, and miss a day of work. These children arrived with mental illnesses, lice, strep throat, and pregnancy situations.”
Health Care
But we were told by the media that illegal immigrants are NOT a threat to us, either physically, medically or in any other way. We’ve heard some of these stories before, that illegal immigrants have access to better health care than our veterans. I certainly believe those stories, but we now hear they have better access than our own government workers. Remember, these government workers are hired under contract, meaning the government does not have to provide the same level of services they would to workers employed full-time under their umbrella. It is also easier to control the potential “whistle-blower” factions that might arise under direct employment.
The Illegal Immigrants’ Stories
“As I talked to the children/youth, I found out many things that transpired in their lives, forcing them to leave their country. Some told me they were running from the cartel, some had witnessed murders, some had been in the drug scene, some had been or were gang members, and some were just desiring a new life where they could prosper. They told of stories where they worked the field to make a living for their family. At the age of 11 or 12 they were already supporting their grandmothers or their mothers. They were excited to head to their families in the different locations in the U.S., because they thought they could start working immediately. When I explained to them that our government did not allow children under the age of 16 to be employed, they were upset. Some wanted to head back to their country, because they stated America was not as easy to live in as they thought. Many were thinking they were already American Citizens upon entering the United States. They stated Obama gave them the open door to enter the country, and that Obama had stated they would become citizens right away. Ninety percent of them didn’t have a father figure, so they pretty much roamed the streets. They told of rape situations on the trains they had boarded. A small child cried and told me that all he could do was cover his ears and cry, because a gang of boys would rape the girls in the train one after another. Some told of children killed on the way to the United States. They stated that they would cross Mexico and the coyotes would tell them to run to the border, so the Border Patrol could capture them, and the United States would provide for them, not to worry.”
My Story and I’m Sticking To It
Again, the media tells us these stories are FAKE news. Really? These stories came directly from their mouths. My friend who is contracted to take care of the illegals is a credible source I believe, else I would not be relaying her story. She is, however somewhat reluctant to tell her story publicly and prefers to confide only in those she trusts. I understand that. It was somewhat stressful for her. She states that she wanted to see the project to its conclusion and wanted to know more about what was behind it all. She also stated to me that the financial enticements were significant. I believe this made her even more curious. She also conveyed to me others she knew were working for the project and their interest were more of a financial nature. I conclude from all this the pay must have been quite good. Does it not sound like there may have been a level of hush money beyond the services performed?
Arizona and ICE
“The children told me of the difficult time they spent at the ICE Facility in Arizona. They told me they were treated like animals by ICE officials. ICE placed them all in a big facility and all they did was sit on the floor, until they were processed. They stated when night came, they would set the cooler at 50 degrees, causing them to become extremely cold. The children stated they would huddle together to keep warm, but would have to call the ICE officials, when they could no longer endure the cold. At that point ICE Officials would provide them with spread heat shield technology wraps (the kind firefighters use out in forest fires), and those would become their blankets. They stated when it was time to eat, they would throw packs of small Lunchables for them to eat. Some stated they wished they had stayed in their native country, instead of coming to the U.S. to be treated like animals.”
Cold as Ice
The illegal immigrants complained of their mistreatment at the hands of ICE officials in Arizona. I cannot ascertain the motivation behind setting the temperature at night. Perhaps it was to keep them uncomfortable as we do with criminals in prison so that they do not conspire to escape or otherwise pose problems for their captors? I can only speculate but remember it is ICE who are handling them in Arizona. Once they are turned over to the civilian contract workers it is under a totally different supervision.
The Transfer
“As they arrived to my location, they thought they were coming to the same situatution they left in Arizona, but they were so relieved to see the treatment at our end was 100% different. They were thrilled to bathe, to receive clothes, a warm bed, shoes, underclothes, games, and more importantly good food. When I took all their belongings, I would say 70% of them, had a piece of the heat wrap with them. I asked them why they carried this piece of wrap. Their response, ‘Because we want to remember how we were greeted when we entered the U.S. and the suffering we had to endure.'”
The Users
These are people who endured suffering all along the trail to the United States. We are just left wondering in amazement why any American would support the movement of people under these conditions even helping to finance such ventures like that of Alex Mensing, a project coordinator with Pueblo Sin Fronterasas, a group in San Diego.
The President
“When President Trump mentioned the criminals coming across our borders, he was right. They were rapist, they were in cartels, they were druggies, and they did bring sicknesses into our country. Not all of the illegals were criminals, but those I talked to sure as hell were. So our President was not incorrect in stating that; he was right. I lived it, I heard their stories, I became sick, because of them. I didn’t inform my superiors about my conversations, because they were just plain busy and I didn’t think they would have any interest in the information I was provided.”
The President was Right
President Trump was indeed correct in describing many of those who come to the United States illegally. He is correct in assessing the humanitarian difficulties of illegal immigration and why we as decent human beings cannot promote and encourage the atrocities as described here.
Her Summation
“Long story short, it’s really a scary thought that our government takes action without the United States Citizens knowledge of what’s transpiring. There’s much secrecy. We spend billions of dollars on illegals, we spend millions on contractors, staff (physicians, nurses) air fare, phone calls, clothing, food, shoes, and medication. Obama did much harm to our country. I remember an illegal child asking me if I would please thank President Obama for allowing them to cross over to become U.S. Citizens. My supervisor turned to look at me in awe, difficult to process. We spend millions on them, and yet our Veterans suffer to such horrible extents. Do we need a wall? HELL YES WE DO! Our country does without, just to assist the illegal immigrate population. How fair is that?”
My Summation
I commend my good friend and patriotic citizen for her candor in compiling this report for it may serve in some way to save a life or lives, whether it be the illegal immigrant or the American victim of the unvetted immigrant. I condemn those who keep secrets, leak the good stuff and hide the bad. This is what happens in the Third World, not America.
I have always been baffled by what the Left deems Social Justice and their push for a nation without borders – OURS. A nation without borders will eventually be consumed by chaos. There cannot be good cause for this as ours is a nation born from human endeavors to serve God. Our charge is to do what is right in God’s eyes. It cannot be that subjecting poor people to the extremes of migration for a better life for some and not so better for others is God’s way. I reject any explanation to the contrary. So what is left to explain the situation? It could only be that there are people like Alex Mensing who use the illegal trade and the people in it as pawns to further their careers. But what about others on the Left, the media and the Democrats who say we need open borders? They are all on the same page and for only one reason that I can surmise – to create an underclass of reliable voters. They care not of the harsh reality of what illegal immigration does to the participants and to the U. S. citizenry. They care not of the rapes and murders that happen along the way. They tell us it doesn’t happen. They lie to us but even Amnesty International just recently issued a report verifying up to 60% of the women in these caravans in Mexico have been raped. Amnesty International is NO conservative organization. We can only speculate how many died along the trail, were murdered, abused, ad nauseum. Perhaps they did not get the same memo handed out to every liberal media organization. Perhaps they are not as political. Perhaps the Left should not be as well.
My friend speaks of the United States Emergency Management Team. I believe this to be FEMA. Is it now FEMA’s charge to take care of illegals, even minor illegals? Apparently the Obama Administration thought so. It appears they were using FEMA as a go-between for the transfer from ICE to their ultimate destination. The illegal population must be dispersed amongst us in the various states so that concentrations would not form thereby eliciting the curious eye. In that way they would make illegal immigration what they saw as a small problem for many instead of a big problem for some. I’m just speculating but why else intersperse the illegal population around the whole nation in such a fashion? It is the secrecy of these operations that is the most egregious abuse of power. It is what makes the citizenry distrust the government, especially the Federal government. And now my friend tells me the contracting company is out mobilizing again for the next expected coming wave of illegals. But she said she would not participate again. She is clearly bothered by the whole sordid affair.
We are living in a nation replete with liars, leakers and liberals. But they are all the same thing.
The 2018 Real County GOP Candidate Forum made a big splash with 22 candidates speaking to an estimated crowd of 120. The event began with 10 candidates vying for the one spot for Congressional District 21. There are a total of 18 candidates that have filed for the position. Candidates for CD 21 participating in the event included Mauro Garza, Chip Roy (by Nathan McDaniel), Jenifer Sarver, Susan Narvaiz, Samuel Temple, Anthony J. White, Jason Issac, Francisco “Quico” Canseco, Al M. Poteet and Matt McCall. These 10 congressional candidates received 5 minutes total including their own managed time allotment for Q/A. Most categorized themselves as conservative except Samuel Temple who called himself moderate and quipped about talking to the two moderates in the room after the event. The most common questions answered were on the economy and out-of-control spending and immigration and border wall issues. All that were asked whether they supported the President’s agenda were affirmative. Some were asked whether they lived in the district as it appears several do not. That subject was avoided from a voluntary standpoint. It is easy to understand why as it is inconsistent with the state and local candidate requirement to live in the district, county or precinct a candidate seeks to represent in Texas. Several candidates are organizing followup visits to the county prior to early voting even with the realization that Real County is small but also recognizing the vibrancy and enthusiasm for everything Republican. Real County is by far the reddest in the district having voted 86% for Donald Trump.
The local candidates for office followed the congressional group and began with Jack DuBose running unopposed (incumbent County Chairman) joking about his “mighty stature” that no one dared to file against him and by the way the money is good (ok, that was me, and what money is he talking about?). I was just trying to lighten the mood for some of the local candidates who I knew were quite nervous. Kevin Chisum (incumbent) also running unopposed for Constable followed my lead quipping about his hair (what hair?). Where Kevin gets his haircuts came up several times thereafter egged on by another unopposed candidate in Sheriff Nathan Johnson who should be awarded comedic of the night. Sheriff Johnson had the crowd roaring. It was a turnabout after the more serious nature of CD 21. But then we had to get back to business with those competitive races. Next up for Commissioner Pct 4 was Bryan Shackelford who wondered aloud halfway through his speech how many minutes were left on the clock but then went on to answer some tough questions. His competition came from Shawn Streib Gray who kept herself on track with notes and her knowledge of the community from her work as a realtor. Charles Hunger gave a rather detailed look at the county and his projection of what the commissioner’s job should be and also showed his knowledge of the community. Rudy Gonzalez returned to the light hearted theme of the night complaining about his shaky legs, a rather honest self-assessment and answered all questions very well, a testament to his extensive voluntary work. Don’t worry Rudy, my legs were shaking too. Lana Carr came off as very knowledgeable in her bid for Justice of the Peace followed by the incumbent Dianne Rogers perhaps better known for her work with EMS and quipped about “hauling off a few people” in those ambulances. She let it be known though that she is running for reelection for JP, not EMS. The evening wrapped up with the 3 candidates running for County Judge beginning with Gary Overbay who focused on his character, leadership qualities and community involvement. J. D. Martinez followed with an expose on his background in a rather extensive and experienced leadership role in law enforcement in the Rio Grande Valley and other places. Bella Rubio wrapped up the night talking about her experience in the courtroom and as county clerk and why she can do the job. All three County Judge candidates left little or no time for questions, but perhaps that was smart since in this small community, more opportunities are available for Q/A.
The night was informative but fun and entertaining, all the ingredients of what we strive for in presenting candidates to lead us into the future in today’s world of politics that have recently become rather dark at times. Who are we if we can’t make politics fun again?
On July 17, 2017 the Real County Republican Party unanimously passed the following resolution:
The Real County Republican Party had an entry in the 2017 Independence Day Parade in Leakey, Texas. We entered a 1929 Ford Model A followed by our signature red tractor pulling the official trailer hauling our good Republicans Stuart and Marian Knowlton and including President Trump and Vice President Pence. That entry was followed by Ray Meyers of the Kaufman County Tea Party in his diesel powered utility vehicle. All three entries were ringed by Les Hearron on his homemade built motor bicycle. Our entries won second place for organizations and clubs. We also had two horse riders not officially part of the entries but riding for us nonetheless. Riding on the horses were Dr. Alma Arredondo-Lynch candidate for Congressional District 23 U.S. Congress and our granddaughter Bella Smith. Thank you to all the Real County Republicans who helped put this together.
Saturday at the 2nd Quarter Meeting of the State Republican Executive Committee in Austin, James Dickey defeated Rick Figueroa by a razor thin margin of 32-31 and thus was elected interim Chair of the Republican Party of Texas. The election was hastily called following the abrupt resignation of Tom Mechler on May 20, 2017. Dickey will serve out the remaining term of the out-going Chairman. That term expires at the next State GOP Convention scheduled next year in May.
In 1607 Jamestown was established as the first permanent colony in the New World. What few people know is that the original charter called for establishing the colony as a sort of communal experiment where there would be no property rights, no independent commerce, no capitalism per se. Within 2 years more than half the colonists had died. It was an early experiment in social engineering patterned as a forerunner of the modern day communist model. It was a complete and utter failure, a bust, a disaster that almost brought down the entire colony. The colonists had learned their lesson and made adjustments, to survive.
In 1620 the Plymouth Plantation was established by William Bradford again using a communal social model similar to the failed experiment in Jamestown. William Bradford took meticulous notes now known as History of Plymouth Plantation and later compiled in the book Of Plymouth Plantation. The book is quite a difficult read for modern day man. Most modern Americans just do not have the reading ability and/or intelligent faculties to comprehend such a book. I am not necessarily recommending the book as I myself have not yet reached to ability to consume such an enterprise. I was like most of you, educated in government schools. That aside it is obvious Bradford was very thorough in his assessment of the experiment. Bradford had similar results as John Smith in Jamestown noting that even with the loyalty of God and religion he was not able to motivate the people to do for each other what they would do for themselves. Bradford abandoned the experiment, to survive.
A book I do recommend is The 5000 Year Leap. This book unlike Of Plymouth Plantation is at least written in modern American English. It does the best job I’ve ever seen in laying out the historical birth of our nation and the meaning of a “Divine providence”. Most people are capable of ferreting out fact from fiction if they have a sound reading background. I know that everything in this book is true and real. It is the real American story. I consider this book to be the greatest book ever written on the subject. President Reagan said, “The 5000 Year Leap should be required reading for every student in America.” I agree. It tells the story of America like you’ve never heard if like me you are a product of government education. This book along with another, Original Intent by David Barton I believe encapsulate and embody the meaning of the birth of our nation. I highly recommend the reading of these two books if you are at all curious about the truth. Neither book is of an author of the original documents, but both have that foundation and are much more palatable to our modern understanding.
Today the teaching of history and philosophy in America’s classroom is rapidly being eliminated. I believe this has been the long shared goal of progressives for years. First, they simply attempted and succeeded in changing the story. Once any mention of God or any supreme being was eliminated it censored vast amounts of history in text books leaving holes in the accounts that were hard to explain away. The modern history book simply did not attempt to explain these holes. The next logical step for the progressive government education administrator was simply to eliminate the subject altogether and forever censure the minds of our youth. That would clear a path for the fertile indoctrination of the progressive agenda. They have been largely successful in their strategic goal. The subject is covered in many books and thoroughly documented under titles such as Dumbing Down America, The Death of Common Sense and others. America, just go read something! But I digress.
Now, let’s get back to our story.
Colonists growing tired and weary of tyranny fought and won their liberty, this we all know. The leaders of their day were extremely well read and generally well educated, this we do not generally know. We know the names of these people, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Samuel Adams, Benjamin Franklin. But have you ever heard of George Mason or Fisher Ames? George Mason is considered by historians to be the “Father of the Bill of Rights” and Fisher Ames helped Mason frame the First Amendment. Why were these men left out of history books? Thomas Jefferson gets most of the credit for many of the accomplishments that were really crafted by people like Mason and Ames. Why? Are the history books wrong? In some cases, I would say sadly, yes, but generally history books are not written by historians. They are written by authors and contributors with a political agenda. This is why one must read the original documents or something close to it to get at the truth. I suspect the motive behind the duplicitous behavior of those with historical revisionism in mind comes from the fact that Mason and Ames were very religious men. Thomas Jefferson, on the other hand is famously known as agnostic amongst many within our elitist academic culture. This is also false. Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were probably two of the least overt religious followers but neither were atheist or agnostic by a long shot. Thomas Jefferson actually authored a book entitled The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth, a subject of which is obviously enshrined in the title. Jefferson authored many bills that strengthened protection for religious rights including, A Bill for Punishing Disturbers of Religious Worship and Sabbath Breakers, A Bill Annulling Marriages Prohibited by the Levitical Law and Appointing the Mode of Solemnizing Lawful Marriage, and A Bill for Appointing Days of Public Fasting and Thanksgiving. James Madison offered numerous Presidential proclamations for national days of prayer, fasting and thanksgiving. Jefferson refused to do so on the grounds he believed these functions are better left to the states, hence the popular belief Jefferson was anti-religious. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, it would be a challenge to anyone who could come up with a ‘Founding Father’ who was hostile to religion in general. It just didn’t happen.
So what did the founders intend for us and why are these truths no longer self evident? The founders intended a system of LIMITED government. You find evidence of that obvious fact in the Bill of Rights. Why did they believe it necessary for a Bill of Rights? Well, actually the Bill of Rights were not included in the original document as most of the original authors of the Constitution believed it was spelled out clearly enough without listing each right. But pragmatism won out over ideals and the first ten rights were listed. The Tenth Amendment is probably the most beaten down right of all as it is clear evidence the founders intended all powers not specifically listed and given to the Federal government were reserved to the states and the people. If not true why else have such an amendment? This is why progressives have sought to tear down the Tenth Amendment first. Read it. It means what it says. Is there any right given to the Federal government to impose a national health care standard on the people for example? Of course not. The states may have that right, but the Feds do not, that is clear.
After having lived under the King of England’s vision of ‘Ruler’s Law’, a derivation of Roman Civil Law, the founders were explicit that all law must derive from the ‘Consent of the People’, hence ‘People’s Law’, a derivation of English Common Law. Under ‘People’s Law’ no lawmaker has any more power to rule over another citizen than does any other citizen. The only exceptions to this rule would be spelled out and ‘listed’ in the Constitution. It is and they are. Anything above and beyond the plenary powers imbued by the Constitution would be considered an ‘Usurpation of Powers’ by the people and should be opposed by the people even by the point of the gun if necessary. This is what the founders believed.
So how is all this to be applied by the people? Here is a simple way to know when your federal government has overstepped their bounds. I call it the ‘6-20-10 Rule’. The ‘6-20-10 Rule’ is just the name I’m giving it but spells out the powers of the Executive, the Congress and the Judiciary respectively. These are not all explicitly listed in the Constitution as some are implicitly taken but are generally accepted and unlikely to ever change without new Constitution amendments. I have a problem with a couple of them but will accept for pragmatic argument’s sake: Here they are in abbreviated form:
Executive:
Legislative:
and 1 added power embodied in Amendment XVI
20. To lay and collect taxes on incomes
Judicial:
and 1 power repealed by the 11th Amendment
Disputes in which the citizen of one state sues another state
Any power, act or order by any of the three federal branches of government outside of the ‘6-20-10 Rule’ is an usurpation of power and must be opposed by the people and/or their state representatives.
Analyzing the list which branch do you think is more powerful? Clearly with the breadth and depth of enumerated powers I believe the Legislative Branch should be the most powerful. But I was taught in our government schools about the ‘Balance of Power’ and ‘Co-equal Branches’, etc. I now believe I was taught wrong. It looks like the Executive Branch should be the next most powerful and the Judicial is last. What is the true pecking order today in my opinion?
The Federal Courts according to the Constitution appear to be the most limited of the three branches deriving their powers primarily to hear cases between and amongst the states and cases concerning foreign governments. But where is it today? We have seen a single Federal District Judge shut down all of Congress and/or the President, even preempting and taking over national security without access to security data. The Federal Courts receive the largest part of their power in the form of Constitutional judicial review. This has evolved into a broad and expansive power that has far eclipsed it’s intended application according to the Constitution. Where in the Constitution does it grant the federal courts the power to lay taxes, create new legislation, confiscate property or give orders to any citizen without due process? Over time judges have assumed certain powers of all three branches of government, having not properly limited themselves to judicial proceedings. Judges are probably the biggest offenders and usurpers of their proper function and deserve our utmost attention. We must acknowledge that the unelected Federal Judicial Branch contains individuals that can and have made law, enforced law and ruled on the other branches’ laws, even ruling on their own enacted laws. The Supreme Court has been asked and has complied with requests to rule on “policy issues” clearly a function of Congress and the Executive branch, not the Court. Prime examples we all recognize of course is Roe v. Wade in 1973 declaring abortion the “Law of the Land” thereby preempting both Congress, the Executive and the States from exercising their proper role. The clearest example of this technique to date was Obergefell v. Hodges in 2014 declaring “marriage equality” for all. These cases are the clearest examples of judicial usurpation since the only arguments that can be manufactured are not even “inferred rights” from the Constitution but rights created based upon the Court’s collective personal views. They will argue things like “equal protection” hold sway when in fact the ‘Equal Protection Clause’ was designed to force the states to protect its citizens with “the equal protection of the laws” enacted in their state. The Court here ‘created’ a new law and essentially directed each state to write new laws in accordance with their unwritten one. The courts should not even be hearing cases rooted in state and local policy provided they were duly passed by the states.
So how did we get here? You will find no explicit reference in the Constitution about anything resembling ‘Judicial review’. Judicial review I believe began in 1803 when the Marshall Court took it upon themselves in a case Marbury vs Madison. The case is not as important as the taking of power in effect declaring the Court to be the ‘Supreme rule’ in cases to include Constitutional law. Even though the Constitution is silent on this the Court inferred the power of judicial review upon itself by virtue of the judicial structure as described in the Constitution. But the Constitution only says there shall be one Supreme Court and does not even specify how many judges although again inferring there shall be at least one or arguably two since it does mention a Chief Justice. The Judicial branch has assumed its position as the most powerful branch using the concept of ‘stare decisis’, the ever increasing entropy of power abrogated from precedence and because we simply haven’t had a Congress and Executive branch willing to curtail their incursions.
It is clear to me at least the Executive branch is the second most powerful branch as it has evolved today. Presidents cannot declare and execute war on their own, although they have. The president has no power to order regulations of any kind or abrogate those powers to a self-appointed czar, although again they have. He has no power to make and execute orders to anyone outside the executive branch, although he has. Presidents tend to take powers they do not have. We see many examples of that but what about the power they are charged with, like Executive edict #1, to carry out the laws of the land. President Obama had his Attorney General flatly issue a directive to refuse to carry out the provisions of the “American Defense of Marriage Act”. It is expressly forbidden and illegal for a president to ignore a law just because he does not like it and is an act worthy of impeachment. It could be argued that the “American Defense of Marriage Act” is unconstitutional for its usurpation of the 10th Amendment but certainly the Executive branch must not unilaterally make their own law then lobby the Judicial branch to go along. How many Presidents have ignored the “War Powers Act”? Until such time as it is declared unconstitutional the law must be followed. How such laws are declared unconstitutional is open to debate, I concede, but I have already established the power of Judicial Review until such time we can retake that power in some form.
Congress is more powerful according to the Constitution but look at Legislative edict #3. This is where all three branches of government teamed up in 1943 to usurp power from the people. I wrote about this in Capitalism and the Courts last year. FDR threatened to pack the Supreme Court to rule that Congress has the power to regulate almost anything. But the Constitution specifically limits the regulation of commerce AMONG the several states. This is where history becomes very important to understand the background, motivation and derivation of this power. This power was constructed by the founders to allow the federal government the ability to regulate commerce to the extent that all states had equal access and that no state shall lay duties or impose tariffs on another, a problem of it’s time under the Articles of Confederation. They also gave power to regulate commerce with foreign nations and the Indians. Where do you think Obamacare falls here? Nowhere is it mentioned that Congress, the President or the Courts have any power to regulate anything on the citizen level or for that matter the state level unless it is to ensure equal footing amongst the states. We all understand the word AMONG don’t we? It does not say WITHIN. The usurpation of power encapsulated in the evolved form of the ‘Commerce Clause’ as it is known is in my opinion the most serious of all. Where Congress should be exercising their power they have instead abrogated to the Treasury or the Federal Reserve giving them power to borrow and to set the value of our currency. The Treasury department is not even under Congress but part of the Executive branch. The Fed (short notation for the Federal Reserve) is not part of either. The Fed is technically an independent corporation not answerable to Congress, the President or the federal courts. Congress does not have the power to create another congress, which is really what they have done in creating the Fed, but worse because there are no checks and balances applied to the Fed, no veto power over their actions and not even any transparency evidenced by the on-going efforts of certain legislators inability to see the books.
So where do we go from here and how can we change and hope for a better future? First, we must educate ourselves and others. Second, we must organize amongst like-thinking individuals and devise plans to overthrow the denigrative agendas from within our current governments. Third, we must repeal and replace those who seek to bring us down bringing forth those who wish to restore the nation to it’s rightful roots. And fourth, we must maintain everlasting vigilance. Does this not sound a whole lot like what the ‘Founding Fathers’ did to create a ‘More perfect union’? Alas, history must repeat itself once again.
December 13, 2016 @ 6 PM
1363 RR 336, Leakey, TX
We are holding the Real County 4th quarter GOP meeting at our home followed by a celebration of Christmas. All Republicans are invited. Please respond with RSVP to Jack DuBose 830-279-4603 or Terri DuBose 830-279-2263 or email: riovista@reagan.com.
The Real County Republican Party had two entries in the annual Independence Day Parade in Leakey, Texas. Both entries were for the expressed purpose of promoting the local party apparatus and to showcase our Senate District 19 candidate for the Texas Senate, Pete Flores. Our entry won first place for organizations and clubs.
Recent Comments